"GPT 6 luna price" is one of the few queries in this wave where our captured sources actually contain a number. The directory description states it flatly: "standard pricing of $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens" for OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna vendor claim. We will report that anchor — with its source, its limits, and a healthy instruction: confirm on OpenAI's official pricing page before making any decision, because the directory, not us, is vouching for the figure. Our tracker logged the phrase at roughly 0.08× the GPTs baseline and rising, with four dedicated pages in the field observed. Labels: vendor claim / observed / analysis.
Luna is the sibling of Sol: OpenAI announced the two together in "Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna" on openai.com observed. Directory descriptions position the pair as the family's affordable workhorses — Sol described as "low-cost, high-performance," with a price anchor now attached to Luna by the directory entry for this very query vendor claim. The family context, and the successor question around it, live on GPT Sol 6.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol vs Astra.
| Component | Directory-anchored figure | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokens | $0.10 per 1M tokens vendor claim | Directory description, captured October 2026 — not verified against OpenAI directly analysis |
| Output tokens | $0.50 per 1M tokens vendor claim | Same source, same caveats analysis |
| Label | "Standard price" per the description vendor claim | Standard ≠ only: promotional, batch or tiered rates can differ analysis |
| Final authority | OpenAI's official pricing page — always; the directory anchor is a starting point, not a quote analysis | |
Two features of the anchor are worth noting because they match the common shape of API pricing analysis: output bills at roughly 5× input, and the absolute levels are low — consistent with the family's "affordable workhorse" positioning across descriptions vendor claim. If the anchor is right, a workload writing a million tokens of output costs fifty cents; the expensive part of most real applications remains the input side, where context and tool output accumulate analysis.
Rates are trivia; bills are decisions. The workable path analysis:
For the Anthropic-side pricing questions, our sibling pages Sonnet 5.5 price and Sonnet 5.5 cost apply the same labeled-claims discipline.
It is the directory description's "standard price" vendor claim — a credible starting anchor that must be confirmed on OpenAI's official pricing page; we cannot and do not guarantee it analysis.
No verified side-by-side exists in our captures; the descriptions position both as the affordable half of the family. Compare official rates at equal workloads before concluding analysis.
Almost certainly not — per-token API rates and flat consumer plans are different products. Don't compare one to the other analysis.
You shouldn't trust either blindly — the difference is we tell you the anchor's source and shelf life, then send you to the official page. That's the whole discipline analysis.
This page is descriptive and independent, last reviewed October 8, 2026. Not affiliated with OpenAI. "OpenAI" and "GPT" are trademarks of their respective owners; the price anchor is a third-party directory claim reported with attribution and not independently verified.